From the “ lens i propose ……. Marxist and ambedkarite Marxist “ sounds like a rambling . While you do get back on the track from the discussion on the Palkhi and Christopher Jafferlot , the middle part goes on a random tangent which breaks the flow of the article, in my opinion .
Delight to read except for the last part
What is the problem?
From the “ lens i propose ……. Marxist and ambedkarite Marxist “ sounds like a rambling . While you do get back on the track from the discussion on the Palkhi and Christopher Jafferlot , the middle part goes on a random tangent which breaks the flow of the article, in my opinion .